Book Review – Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign

5 Jun

(Jonathan Allen, Amie Parnes)

“Why aren’t they with me?”

-Hillary

“For both sides, Hillary was the perfect symbol of everything that was wrong with America. At times, Trump and Sanders would act as the right and left speakers of a stereo blaring a chorus on repeat: Hillary’s a corrupt insider who has helped rig the political and economic systems in favour of the powerful.”

-The Authors

There is very little I can say about Shattered that has not been said already (and then repeated, time and time again.) You would get the high points just by digging through a multitude of online book reviews. But I digress …

The book purports to be a detailed study of Hillary Clinton’s ultimately unsuccessful bid to become President in 2016, although – as most of the sources are unnamed – it is difficult to know how seriously to take it. (Hillary’s supporters have denied many of the suggestions regarding infighting within the campaign.)

Ironically, the book actually goes easier on Hillary (and Huma) than you might expect. It does make the droll observation that everything changed, between 2008 and 2016, apart from the candidate herself – and that was the problem – but otherwise it is relatively gentle in many parts. While it pulls no punches about the email issue, it does highlight the simple fact that Hillary never really acknowledged just how serious a problem it was – and while she was never charged with anything, the affair exposed her repeated lies to the press and the public.

Hillary’s core problem, it seems, was that her campaign staff were often hilariously out of touch with modern America. Their data-driven campaign didn’t seem to take into account the simple possibility that the data itself might be flawed, or that ‘ground truth’ was often different from the models. Hillary, therefore, was blindsided by Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump – she never anticipated having to actually fight for the nomination. Indeed, the Clintons tried hard to clear house in Washington between 2009 and 2015, pushing other potential candidates out of consideration. This had the ironic side effect of clearing the way for Sanders, as he was the only Democrat (for a given value of Democrat) who put forward a serious challenge.

Beyond that, Hillary never appointed anyone with significant decision-making power – she preferred to keep her supporters divided. Worse, she valued loyalty over competence – and refused to allow anyone to speak truth to power. This ensured that the campaign lurched from side to side, providing moments of unintentional humour – one media interview that should have been a doddle turned into a nightmare because there was a misunderstanding about who should give the interview – and nightmarish errors of judgment. Hillary simply never came across as likable, nor did she show calculated ruthlessness when necessary. Although the book doesn’t discuss the problems at the DNC – and the charges that Hillary’s supporters rigged the nomination – it does highlight Hillary’s failings in not washing her hands of certain people as quickly as possible.

In the end, the core lesson of Shattered is that many of the problems were with Hillary herself. Her history was too great an issue to surmount. Giving speeches for money – speeches that never became public – weighed her down, as did the email server issue. She simply couldn’t connect with the common person – the ‘deplorables’. And she was never able to escape the shadow of Bill, Chelsea and Huma.

Worse, Hillary was never able to put forward a coherent rationale for her campaign – why was she even running for President? ‘I’m with Her’ could easily – and did – turn into ‘it’s all about ME.’ For all its flaws, ‘Make America Great Again’ is far more inspiring. Even that turned against Hillary. Arguing that ‘America is already great’ fell in deaf ears in places that that were demonstrably suffering economic hardship.

Indeed, Hillary may well have run into the growing cancer within the Democratic Party – factionalism. The Democrats, as I see them, are a set of constituencies, each of which has its own demands. Balancing those demands is not easy. Hillary simply lacked the ability to do it. Among other things, she needed to paint herself as both Obama’s successor and her own woman. Trying to plug either one too far would make the other impossible.

It is difficult to know just how seriously to take Shattered. The lack of genuine sources makes it hard to know who is speaking – among other things, the authors could not have any access to Hillary’s private thoughts. And the people speaking to the authors were doing so in hindsight, after losing the election. But if most of the book is true, one may ask – quite reasonably – how Hillary came so close to winning? She certainly thought she held all the cards. But pride normally does go before a fall.

Overall, the book is worth a read. But – like all such books – it has to be taken carefully.

(On a different note, my copy – and every copy I saw in various shops – looked as though it had been hacked out with a buzz saw. This seems to be a common problem these days.)

Advertisements

11 Responses to “Book Review – Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign”

  1. Paul (Drak Bibliophile) Howard June 5, 2017 at 8:58 pm #

    Good point about “unnamed sources”.

    I’m honest about my dislike of Hillary Clinton but I also dislike hearing stories about people when the sources of the information aren’t willing to be named. 😦

    Of course, how do these “unnamed sources” know what Hillary’s private thoughts were is also an “interesting” question. 😉

    • chrishanger June 9, 2017 at 8:22 pm #

      They can’t

      Really, I see that a lot in books like these.

      Chris

  2. shrekgrinch June 5, 2017 at 11:34 pm #

    “Unnamed sources” = “our excuse to piss all over you [fake news] while calling it rain”

    Especially these days.

  3. PhilippeO June 6, 2017 at 3:30 am #

    ” But if most of the book is true, one may ask – quite reasonably – how Hillary came so close to winning ? ”

    Disclaimer, I never read the book.

    Because, well for all condemnation of Hillary and Democrats, they are not unique, they are normal way world works. In any stable and mature institution, emergence of bureaucratization, professional “leader” class, factionalization, log-rolling/ cronyism, detachment from constituency all emerges. Labor union, teacher union, environmental movement, feminist movement, Pentagon, Microsoft, etc. That “Iron Law of Bureaucracy” in operation.

    And its not all bad. Tammany Hall successfully integrate Irish immigrant. Microsoft successfully dominate Office application. Union managed to secure pension and prevent unjust firing of workers. Democrats nominates very competent political leader. etc.

    a “movement” had many drawback. Implausible and Unrealistic goal. Egoistic and dominating leader. Incompetence in leadership and management. Inability in handling crisis. Thats why most attempt at reform failed. For lucky one, they become big enough that one of established group added some of its goal to its platform and thus achieving its goal.

  4. thundercloud47 June 6, 2017 at 5:37 am #

    I think I’ll save my money and pass on this book. I’m a bit tired of both politics and un-named sources right now. Instead, I think I’ll spend my money on a couple of your books Chris.

  5. georgephillies June 6, 2017 at 11:41 pm #

    There were advance warnings that her campaign was in difficulty, notably the sizes of her rallies and the Trump rallies. The undecided vote was very large, close to election day. The post-election behavior of liberal democrats was radically ahistorical.They really did not accept the election outcome, and keep looking for some excuse to try impeaching Trump.

    I am reminded of friends who watched the first debate and were absolutely positive that Clinton had beaten Trump. (I voted for neither of the above.) I asked them how many friends who were Trump voters had changed their minds. They didn’t know any Trump supporters. They never encountered political opinions that disagreed with their own. Long term, this will not work.

    You may wish to contrast with the (iirc Singapore) policy that requires that public apartments for the well to do be integrated by race, so every building is a miniature of the entire country.

  6. Tim June 7, 2017 at 8:51 pm #

    Every other candidate that lost the general election has been allowed to retire into obscurity. Why not Hillary? Seems the right likes beating here up so much that they can’t stop.
    The real question is who the standard bearer for the demos is going to be now and what direction will they take the party.

    Tim

  7. Big Ben June 8, 2017 at 3:19 pm #

    Eh, the right keeps harping on Hillary because Trump is such a disaster. They’ll do anything to distract attention from their guy, bringing up Hillary and Obama again and again even though the election was over and done half a year ago.
    Don’t tell me what the other guy did back in the day. Tell me what you’re going to do now and how you’re going to do it!
    Unfortunately for them, as long as Trump’s Twitter finger still works, they’ll have to keep scrambling for distractions.
    As for unnamed sources, today is the day Comey testifies … on record and under oath, which is more than anyone on Team Chump is willing to do. (Or when they have, they lied, lied, lied. Ex-national security advisor, current attorney general, his son-in-law, etc., etc. I never had relations with those pesky Russians!) So here comes Comey and what do the republicans do? … Run attack adds on national television smearing his reputation and honor.
    Damn – I thought we were through with campaign foolery for a year or two.

    • Paul (Drak Bibliophile) Howard June 8, 2017 at 3:41 pm #

      Campaign Season over?

      Nope, as long as Democrats keep attacking Trump for stupid reasons and continue to ignore why Hillary lost, Campaign Season continues.

      Too many Democrats appear to imagine that if Trump is “kicked out”, then Hillary becomes President. 👿

  8. Tarun Elankath June 9, 2017 at 11:10 am #

    Well, in another couple of years we are going to have (several) books about Trumps doomed presidency. I suspect it will make anything Hillary did or fail to do seem like sparkles and butterflies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: